my husband is being convicted of a health and safety codes 1137 9. 6 manufacturing drugs and narcotics the state appointed attorney does not identify were the cops went wrong making a warrantless arrest with my husband they ignored the California Rules of search and seizure they mislead judges in order to bamboozle California search warrants the state attorney that we have told him that the 2-year deal which I feel is more than two years would be better for him instead suppressing the evidence which I feel that they don't have a case and I need an i need to ask you which would be better for him to take a deal or to suppress the evidence I feel very strongly thatdthe event but he's afraid that he might get more than what he fighting for should he ask for another attorney please help
Answer
If he has good grounds to file a suppression motion and his lawyer fails to file one, that will be considered ineffective assistance of counsel. He should ask his lawyer to explain why he is not filing the suppression motion.
No comments:
Post a Comment